For 4 days, we have shown attacks on residents of our community, LBOC members, and the library. Much has been instigated from forces outside of our parish, but as the evidence shows, they are aided by elected and appointed officials from within our parish. You can find a brief recap here: https://www.lplalliance.com/the-removal-of-fran-smith.
Outspoken and strong women are being targeted and talked down to by people in elected and appointed positions in our Parish. It is a growing problem. For example, planning commission member Brian Clemmons posted about LPL Library Director Michelle Parrish, as if she were a dog, stating, “She needs to be called to heel,” when Councilman Chavers said he was considering appointing a new LBOC member from a list of community members Michelle recommended. Councilman Chavers can appoint any person he likes; he is not required to choose from Michelle’s recommendations. However, a good library director passes on names to Council members of those who show interest in joining the board. To date, Councilman Chavers has not defended Michelle from this personal attack. This is not the first time Brian Clemmons has spoken derogatively about women. Does our Parish President approve of this behavior? We hope not.
Post: https://tinyurl.com/LPLAbcd
We expect more from our elected and appointed officials. Fran Smith had enough of the repeated abuse and privately said so. She is human. Others consistently push hate at LBOC meetings and on social media with zero repercussions. If you don’t see the double standard, then you might be a part of the problem.
When is it going to stop–when our library is finally destroyed? Ask yourselves if the people attacking our library even use the library or have library cards. I think you already know the answer. Ask yourselves what their REAL agenda is. There are better ways to gain attention than maligning our library.
A local pastor held up a book he didn’t like at the last Parish Council meeting, stating he has plans to read from it at the next LBOC. This is referred to as a “book crisis actor”. He wants to get attention. He then said he had a list of 125 books he wanted removed. Based on the misinformed and hysterical posts he often makes on social media, we do not want this man in charge of our reading decisions. We trust the trained and educated librarians.
See this article titled, “Hero Syndrome in Book Banning Efforts”: https://bookriot.com/hero-syndrome-in-book-banning-efforts/
Hero syndrome is much more evident in a hyper-connected world. It gives people a feeling of purpose, and the more they can “empower” others to stand up, the more they are rewarded.
These people show up to meetings, feeling a sense of connection among people in an era of disconnection, and faithfully following others to fight against the topic du jour.
People who read books out of context in open meetings are attention seekers and this is how they go about it. They need all eyes on them. It’s not about the books.
Through public records requests, we have found that four new titles have been challenged, and we suspect there are more (based on social media comments). These are not in the children’s section. They are in Young Adult/Teen. The library has a tiered library card system, so parents have to sign off on book checkouts for kids under 16 unless they sign away permissions. If a parent doesn’t want their kid to check out a book, and they’re under 16, they can’t anyway. And if a parent doesn’t want their kid even looking in the Teen/YA section, they should come to the library with them. The library is not a daycare.
Library Card Policy for Minors: https://tinyurl.com/LPLAlcp
Unaccompanied Minors Policy: https://tinyurl.com/LPLAmcil
The currently known challenged books are:
The Perks of Being a Wallflower
Me, Early, and the Dying Girl
Damsel
13 Reasons Why
These books are written for teens and are in the teen section.
This week, we posted the following about LBOC member Dewanna Christian: “Fran saw fellow LBOC member Dewanna Christian stoking the flames against the library on social media. She also saw her not take her role on the LBOC seriously by asking if she even has to read the challenged books. We feel all LBOC should take their positions seriously by promoting the library in a positive light online, and by committing to reading and reflecting on all of the challenged books.”
Apparently the truth struck a nerve. Mrs. Christian posted, “Do y’all know that the library alliance group thinks we should ignore sexually explicit material if the book as a whole has a good story to tell?”
As a group of citizens dedicated to supporting the 1st Amendment, library policies, and the law, of course we expect a LBOC member to do her due diligence and read the entire book. It’s in her description of duties as a board member. The Supreme Court has previously ruled (Miller vs California) regarding how to evaluate books. We expect her to follow the law. If she cannot follow library policy and/or law, she should not be on the board.
This is what she had to say about it (in her own words): https://tinyurl.com/LPLAfdce
There’s also been much discussion about the law. What is The Miller Test?
The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. As per the Supreme Court, materials MUST PASS ALL 3 PRONGS of the Miller Test. They are:
whether the average person applying contemporary community standards would find the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
References: https://tinyurl.com/LPLAmtedc
Miller vs California: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/413/15/
We will be posting summaries, professional reviews, etc for these books soon. With the repeated removal of level-headed LBOC members, we expect blatant censorship against these books and others by the new board. We hope we are wrong.
If successful, they will continue to remove and relocate books from our public library—books that have been around for many years with no problems. Books that are widely recognized as having literary merit.
It is not about the books. It is about the violation of everyone’s first amendment protections and the freedom to read. It is about them wanting to be angry about something and they’ve been told to be angry at the library. It is about them trying to have power and control over what the rest of us have access to in the public library.
Know the facts. Fight the lies. Stand with the library.
To be continued in the coming weeks…..